In physics, gender is simultaneously highly invisible and highly visible.
On one hand, the discipline as such is often seen as completely unaffected
by social structures, making gender on one level highly invisible. On the
other hand, the overwhelming majority of physicists are men, making gender
on a different level very visible. In this tension of the in/visibility of
gender, physics students are learning to become physicists - a learning
that involves both the learning of content knowledge and the constitution
of a physicist identity. The focus of this talk is on the latter, on how
physics students constitute gendered physicist identities. In particular I
am interested in how this takes place in relation to their participation
in laboratory work.
In the talk I focus on how the physics students I have interviewed can be
understood as constructing the boundaries of the physicist community and
identities as physicists in relation to these perceived boundaries. For
example, what do physics students see as appropriate and inappropriate
practices in the laboratory? Which approaches to laboratory work are seen
as having/giving high status? What does it take for a physics student to
identify as a physicist?
The theoretical point of departure is a conceptualisation of both gender
and learning as aspects of identity constitution, instead of viewing them
as individual attributes. In short, I explore how physics students
simultaneously `do physics' and `do gender'. In doing so I am able to
provide new and deeper insights into issues of physics, learning and
gender, which also will be discussed in relation to implications for
teaching.