Spin Fluctuations and the Peak-Dip-Hump Structure in the Photoelectron Spectrum of Actinide Metals

5 Jun 2013, 09:40
40m
122:026

122:026

Speaker

Matthias Graf (LANL)

Description

We present first-principles based multiband spin-fluctuation calculations within the random-phase approximation for four isostructural intermetallic actinides, namely the superconductors PuCoIn5, PuCoGa5, PuRhGa5, and the paramagnet UCoGa5. The results show that a strong peak in the spin-fluctuation dressed self-energy is present around 0.5 eV in all materials, which is mostly created by 5f electrons. These fluctuations are coupled to electrons, which gives rise to the peak-dip-hump structure in the spectral function, characteristic of the coexistence of itinerant and localized electronic states. Our results are in quantitative agreement with available photoelectron spectra on PuCoGa5 [1] and UCoGa5 [2]. Our self-consistent intermediate Coulomb coupling GW calculations of the self-energy are performed within the fluctuation exchange approximation [3,4] using first-principles electronic structure input obtained from the density functional theory within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA). We find that the effective coupling of electrons to spin fluctuations creates a dip in the single-particle excitations due to strong scattering between spin-orbit split states. The lost spectral weight (dip) in the spectral function is distributed partially to the renormalized itinerant states at the Fermi level (peak), as well as to the strongly localized incoherent states at higher energy (hump). The coherent states at the Fermi level can still be characterized as Bloch waves, though strongly renormalized, whereas the incoherent electrons are localized in real space exhibiting the dispersionless hump structure. We will discuss the impact of our first-principles based intermediate coupling model for calculating electronic hot spots in the spectral function and the multiband spin-fluctuation spectrum relevant for electric and thermal transport in both actinide metals and nuclear fuel materials. This work was supported by the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396 through the Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES) and the LDRD Program at LANL. We acknowledge a NERSC computing allocation of the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

[1] T. Das, J.-X. Zhu, and M.J. Graf (2012), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 137001.
[2] T. Das, T. Durakiewicz, J.-X. Zhu, J.J. Joyce, J. L. Sarrao, and M.J. Graf (2012), Phys. Rev. X 2, 041012.
[3] R.S. Markiewicz, T. Das, S. Basak, and A. Bansil (2010), J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 181, 23.
[4] T. Das, J.-X. Zhu, and M.J. Graf (2013), J. Materials Research 28, 659.

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.